Non-Things: The Upheaval of the Digital Lifeworld

**

Non-Things: The Upheaval of the Digital Lifeworld

Executive Summary

The transition from the “terrestrial order” to the “digital order” marks a fundamental shift in human existence, characterized by the replacement of stable things with fleeting “non-things”—information. This briefing examines the work of Byung-Chul Han, who argues that the informatization of the lifeworld is de-reifying reality, abolishing memory, and transforming the human being from a “Dasein” (a being of action and care) into an “inforg” (a being of communication and consumption).Critical takeaways include:

• De-reification of Being:  Things once provided a “stable environment for dwelling” and continuity for human identity. Information, by contrast, is contingent, fleeting, and destabilizing.

• The End of Action:  The human “hand,” the organ of work and historical action, is being replaced by the “finger,” the organ of digital choice. This shift signifies a move from historical agency to a “post-history” of play and consumption.

• Surveillance through Convenience:  The “smart home” and the smartphone act as “smart prisons” where surveillance is masked by convenience and “likes.”

• Loss of the “Other”:  Digital media eliminates the “Other” (the gaze, the voice, the resistance of reality), leading to a narcissistic, “autistic” relationship with the world.

• AI and the Death of Thought:  Artificial Intelligence cannot “think” because it lacks “attunement,” “mood,” and “spirit.” It operates on correlations rather than the conceptual “grip” of human reason.

I. The Shift from Things to Non-Things

The terrestrial order consists of things that take on permanent forms and provide a stable environment for human life. Today, this is being supplanted by a digital order that informatizes the world.

Stability vs. Contingency

• Things as Anchors:  Things stabilize life by providing continuity. Humans retrieve their identity through their relationship to stable objects (e.g., a specific chair or table).

• Information as Flux:  Information is relevant only fleetingly and lives off the “capacity to surprise.” It agitates the cognitive system and lacks the “solidity of being.”

• Infomania:  Libidinal energy has been redirected from objects to data. Society has moved from “object fetishism” to being “infomaniacs” or “datasexuals.”

From Dasein to Inforg

Concept,Terrestrial Order (Heidegger’s Dasein),Digital Order (The Inforg)

Primary Organ,The Hand (Handling/Action),The Finger (Typing/Choosing)

Environmental Relation,“Handling ""ready-to-hand"" things”,“Communicating with ""informatons"""

Nature of Existence,"""Care"" (Sorge), Thrownness, Facticity”,“Play, Self-optimization, De-facticized”

Temporal Structure,“Narrative, History, Memory”,“Additive, Episodic, Data Storage”

II. The Digitalization of Culture and Identity

Digitalization subordinates hardware to software, turning things into “infomatons”—information-processing actors. This shift redefines possession, memory, and the self.

From Possessing to Experiencing

• Access over Ownership:  The sharing economy and digital platforms replace the “sedentary” nature of possession with temporary access. Identity is no longer formed by things we own but by how we “stage” ourselves on social media.

• The Death of “Things Close to the Heart”:  Possession requires an intense libidinal tie and history. Modern consumer goods are “indiscreet” and “over-expressive,” preventing the formation of “soul” through long use.

• Commodification of Life:  Information capitalism commodifies the immaterial (hospitality, friendship, affection). Relationships are replaced by “ratings” and “likes.”

The Narcissism of the Selfie

• Selfie as Non-Thing:  Unlike analogue portraits, which possess an “aura” and a sense of mourning/destiny, selfies are visual communication pieces with no temporal depth.

• Exhibition Value:  The selfie lacks “melancholic beauty.” It is a “communicative act” intended for immediate exhibition and deletion, mirroring the temporality of oral communication (e.g., Snapchat).

• Digital Work of Mourning:  The “funeral selfie” represents the absence of mourning, projecting a “grinning I am” at death.

III. The Smartphone and the Smart Prison

The smartphone is identified as the “main informaton of our time,” serving as a “Ge-Stell” (enframing) that reduces the world to available, consumable information.

• The Autistic Object:  Han differentiates the smartphone from a “transitional object” (like a teddy bear). While a transitional object represents the “Other,” the smartphone is an “autistic” or “narcissistic” object. It lacks the dimension of the “Other” and functions through repetitive compulsion rather than creative play.

• The Loss of Resistance:  Objects (from  obicere , to oppose) traditionally provide resistance. The smartphone’s smooth surface and “smart” interface remove all resistance, impoverishing human experience.

• Smart Power:  Neoliberal rule is “smart” and “permissive.” It does not break the will but serves needs, making the subject dependent and addicted. The “like” is the “digital amen.”

• The Mobile Labour Camp:  Reachability at all times is equated to enslavement. The smartphone acts as a “mobile confessional box” where users voluntarily expose themselves.

IV. Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of Computation

AI is fundamentally different from human thinking because it lacks the “affective-analogue dimension.”

The Necessity of “Attunement”

• Being Gripped:  Human thinking begins with a “fundamental attunement” or “mood” (e.g., wonder, doubt, or fear). AI is “apathetic” and cannot get “goosebumps.”

• Divination:  Thinking involves “heartfelt” divination of horizons. AI is “worldless” and “deaf” to the “voice of Being.”

• The Idiot:  Following Deleuze, Han notes that philosophy requires “making oneself an idiot”—the risk of venturing onto untrodden paths. AI is “too intelligent” to be an “idiot” and can only choose from pre-given options.

Correlation vs. Concept

• Big Data:  Data mining reveals  correlations  (A happens with B), which is the lowest form of knowledge. It does not understand  why .

• The Concept:  Human reason uses “concepts” to include and understand the necessity of relations. AI remains “conceptless” and additive.

• Event-Blindness:  AI learns from the past and computes an “optimized present.” It cannot bring about an “event”—a rupture that puts something altogether new into the world.

V. Recovery of the “Magic of Things”

To counter the “noise” of information, Han emphasizes the importance of stillness and the “magic” of material reality.

• Stillness as Resistance:  Information capitalism hates stillness because it produces nothing. Real stillness “does not subjugate; it elevates.”

• The Jukebox (Case Study):  Han describes the jukebox as a “counter-body” that creates “thing magic.” Its mechanical noises, material vibrations, and visible mechanisms provide a “rising counterpart” that digital sound lacks.

• Vibrant Matter:  There is a need for a new ontology that recognizes matter as “alive.” The digital de-materialization of the world feeds “earth-destroying fantasies of conquest.”

• Rituals:  Rituals are “temporal techniques for housing oneself.” They provide stability to time, just as things provide stability to space.

VI. Concluding Insights: The Disappearance of the Other

The ultimate consequence of the digital order is the “disappearance of the Other.""Digital communication abolishes the personal counterpart, the countenance, the gaze, physical presence… The hell of the same is inhabited by ghosts.”

• Gaze-less World:  Digital screens shield us from reality. Without the gaze of the “Other,” there is a loss of empathy and an intensification of self-referentiality.

• The End of History:  The “handless” human of the future, who only “plays” and “chooses” with their fingertips, embodies the end of history. Genuine freedom requires “acting” ( Handlung ), which necessitates overcoming the resistance of a material world.

• Poverty in World:  The plethora of digital objects leads to a “loss of world.” Depression is characterized as a “pathologically intensified poverty in world” caused by a lack of a “Thou” (a counterpart).

**